June 15, 2007

PHOENIX, AZ - Will there be mandatory ignition interlocks for all drunk drivers?

The fight is on.

Senators are willing to accept a partial repeal of a month-old law which says anyone convicted of even a single DUI can only operate a motor vehicle with an interlock for one year. These devices prevent a vehicle from starting if the motorist has had more than just a minimal amount of alcohol.

The House gave final approval to legislation making several changes in drunk driving laws. SB 1582 even allows a judge to order those who arraigned on drunk driving charges not to drink while awaiting trial, and require them to wear a device that monitors sweat to ensure compliance.But the House version of SB 1582 also repeals a law signed by the governor earlier this year expanding the use of interlocks.

Law mandates interlocks for years for those convicted of "extreme'' DUI - meaning a blood-alcohol content of at least 0.15 - and those who are repeat offenders. But the law signed last month says all convicted of even a single offense of driving with a BAC of at least 0.08, the legal limit, must install devices on any vehicle..

The offer would require interlocks only for those whose BAC reaches 0.10. That eliminates those who while intoxicated - and still breaking the law and facing other punishment - are just slightly over the legal limit.

Gov. Janet Napolitano indicates she is unwilling to undo the provisions a bill she just signed.

One representative wants to give judges the option to order installation of interlocks rather than make it a mandate.

Efforts to make a compromise are also endangered by some on the other side of the issue who want to keep the original law intact.

Will this soften DUI laws? We'll see. The battle continues.