Friday, September 19, 2008

 

California DUI / Drunk Driving interlock idea under attack

The American Beverage Institute (ABI) denounced ignition interlock bill AB2784 which would mandate the installation of breathalyzers in the cars of low-BAC (blood alcohol concentration) first-time California DUI / Drunk Driving offenders.

During testimony in front of the California State Assembly, ABI managing director, Sarah Longwell, opposed AB2784 saying, "We believe that this bill denies judicial discretion and ignores proportional response by mandating ignition interlock devices for low-BAC, first-time offenders."

The ABI further advocated in favor of targeting the high-BAC drivers and repeat offenders, who comprise the core of today’s California DUI / Drunk Driving problem.

“By mandating breathalyzers for first-time offenders who may have has as little as two glasses of wine, this bill ignores the root cause of today’s drunk driving problem—hard core alcohol abusers,” said ABI spokeswoman Sarah Longwell.

The California DUI / Drunk Driving bill pending in California fails to target this population of dangerous drunks. Instead, this legislation would force, even those just one sip over the legal limit, to install California DUI / Drunk Driving breathalyzers in their cars.

“With California’s drunk driving limit set at 0.08% BAC, this bill would mandate that drivers install a breathalyzer in their car for behavior that, according to numerous studies, impairs them less than driving while talking on a hands-free cell phone,” said Longwell. “A 120 pound woman can reach the 0.08% BAC level by having two glasses of wine over two hours. Should she receive the same punishment as someone with a 0.19% BAC level or multiple offenses?"

“This bill won’t help solve the drunk driving problem in California,” she said, “because it targets the wrong people.”

California DUI / Drunk Driving attorneys are at www.sandiegodui.com.



Links to this post:

Create a Link



<< Home

This website & linked blog is made available by this law firm for general information purposes only and to provide a general understanding of the law, not to provide legal advice. Readers of this website/blog are cautioned that reading the website/blog does not create a lawyer-client relationship between the reader and this law firm.
This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?